Adding Insurance to ULIP Now?

I have two questions. But first read the background:

The IRDA has tightened the norms on all unit linked insurance plans (ULIPs) to offer life cover on these products and that they should offer a minimum sum assured payable on death.

Moreover, all unit-linked insurance policies must now come with a minimum policy period of five years.

Question 1: Was it possible to buy ULIP without insurance cover? Yes, obviously is the answer, after reading IRDA’s announcement.

Question 2: Does it make sense to buy insurance for less than 5 years? Nonsense, I would say. But it was indeed possible!

The point I am trying to make is that the ULIPs available in the market were being sold as an investment product and not an insurance cover.

The bigger question is that whether we can charge IRDA of mis-selling instead of charging the Agents who carry out the “hit and run” orders of their masters!

Related posts: Insurance v/s Investments

Mixing Investment with Insurance

Open Letter to a CEO, Private Life Insurer

Coming Soon! RupeeCamp "Financial Planning Workshop". "Join us"

Welcome back! Join me on this journey to improving our financial IQ and sharing what we know. Updates at RSS feed or Email. And spread the word please Thank You!

Whether Disclosure of Commissions by Agents Will Work?

This post continues on what I posted two days back on IRDA asking Agents to disclose commission.

A friend told me that the idea looks very good on paper, but practical implementation is very difficult. Let’s see how.

The Irda had issued a circular on the “benefit illustration” on January 25, 2008. This circular made it mandatory for insurance companies to take the signature of the policyholder on the benefit illustration stating that he (the policyholder) has understood the policy, before taking the policy.

Even then, I know a lot of incidents where agents sign this benefit illustration document themselves, without going through the trouble of explaining the Ulip to the prospective policyholder. Or they just pass it off along with a slew of documents that the policyholder needs to sign at the time of taking the policy.

Another question here is, how many Agents actually understand ULIP themselves other than the fact that it gives a good commission.

And what about us? How many of us would actually understand how an Ulip works, even if the agent were to try to explain it to us.

I still believe that the real issue is not the commissions but a satisfactory customer experience

ULIP: Policy Administration Charges Instead of Premium Allocation Charge

DNA has a report on ULIPs and how some insurance companies are charging as high as 48% of first year premium towards policy administration charges.

Earlier, insurers used to deduct a substantial portion of the premium being paid in the first year as premium allocation charge. If a policyholder was paying a premium of Rs 1 lakh per annum, the premium allocation charge in the first year could be 40%, so Rs 40,000 would be deducted. The money would be used to pay high commissions to agents.

Only the remaining Rs 60,000 (Rs 1 lakh-Rs 40,000) would get invested and against this investment units would be given to the policyholder depending on the prevailing net asset value.

This charge has now come down. But what insurers lost has been more than made up through a much higher “policy administration charge”.
This charge includes the cost of administering the policy, sending regular statements to the policyholder, etc. Typically, it is Rs 40-60 per month or around Rs 500-Rs 700 per year.

But that’s not how things work. In many cases, the policy administration charge is now a certain proportion of the premium paid in the first year of the policy.

In others, it is a portion of the sum assured or the insurance cover on the policy.

It’s a confirmation of what I had to say about selling ULIPs to unsuspecting, ill-informed customers

Now, beware of the policy administration charge masquerading as premium allocation charge!

Who’s the Villain in the ULIP Drama

The Unit-Linked Insurance Plans (Ulips) spat (Link 1, 2 ) between Regulators has dubbed the insurance companies and their Agents as the villains.

However, to my mind, there is another character in the plot who is equally to blame for:

It’s You & Me!

You & I don’t take the time to ask, search, compare financial products. It’s too much of a burden.

We always wants “something’’ from the insurance policy on maturity. Term Insurance में तो मरने पर ही मिलता है

Is the ordinary Indian investor to blame too?

The ULIP Saga: Perspectives of an Ordinary Indian

Amid all the ULIP hoopla in the media, (on my blog too) I got a call yesterday from a distant relative asking me whether it’s a good idea to invest in, what else, a ULIP!

When I asked him whether he has read the recent spat between the regulators on ULIPs, he said that he’s heard of some “Noise” on the issue. But now that he wants to invest some money through his friendly agent, he just wanted to cross check!

I asked him whether he has the option of investing in a Mutual Fund. He said that he’ll have to find that out as his “Friend/Advisor” has not told anything about that other than that there will be some service issues.

Now, I can’t use jargons like front loaded charges, premium allocation charges, asset management charges to make my point with him.

This is what I told him:

ULIPs are a bit costly in the initial years. If you have a long term perspective of > 10 years, trust your friendly agent, and will get proper service, take this ULIP. Also ask for top-up options where you can get lower premium allocation charges. Otherwise find a MUtual Fund Advisor and then talk to me again.

The point is despite so much noise about ULIPs, how do you help an ordinary investor make a better decision? The noise and the hype does not help the ordinary investor. Also, there is a tendency to either extol/disparage the contrasting views. ULIPs are Evil, shout one group. The other group tries to defend ULIPs with all its’ might.

To me, ULIPs is a conceptually a very innovative product. The vast distribution channel of over 30 lakh agents can be leveraged to bring insurance as well as investment to the vast majority of ordinary Indian investors.

But the heavy front loading charges has made ULIPs a costly product which seems to be of much more profits to the sellers (Agents) than the buyers (Policyholders). This information/benefit assymetry is bad.

My hope is that the current spat will help rationalize this excellent product and make it useful for the ordinary Indian investor.

The Great ULIP Drama

As the regulatory war on ULIPs unfold, my hope is that it will blow the lid on the ULIP con game.

Meanwhile there has been some updates and SEBI is not ready to hold back all its punches even though the FM wants a status quo. So the “status quo” only applies to current ULIPs, it said in an order today. New ULIPs will not be allowed. More details at Deepak’s Blog

I also want to share “My ULIP story” by Daksha Bhat, who is one of the countless aggrieved customers of ULIP. Her experience with the top brass of the Insurer as well as IRDA is an eye opener.

I decided to go online and check the Prudential policy. I changed the password online and the very next day the agent logged in and changed the password himself! I complained to Prudential on various counts:

1.)The seller had altered the requested product in the application form & forged my signature on the change.

2.) The seller was not the Agent – his wife was the agent

3.) The seller had changed the password without my permission

4.) The seller had missold the product.

The Prudential staff I spoke to first said, “yes yes he handles his wife’ business.” One woman from the prudential office called me and asked “what problem do you have with bhai? What has he done wrong to you?”

Later they said this did NOT happen, then I went to the very top and they admitted there was some wrong doing and they had ‘counselled’ the agent!

IRDA did not do anything about this – or about my mediclaim policy. Their one line answer to me was “The company’s answer is conspicuous.” Meaningless is an understatement.

So SEBI – here’s to you. More controls please – and when are you going to make misselling a misdemeanour at least? These guys need to have licenses that can be cancelled if they do anything unethical.

Read her entire post in full details

Earlier posts on ULIP: How to sell ULIPs to unsuspecting Customers

ULIP: Rs 50000 turns into Rs 47000

Open Letter to Kamesh Goyal, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance

Do you have a ULIP experience to share?

SEBI Bans ULIPs: Regulators in a Boxing Ring

By banning the sale of ULIPs from 14 insurers, SEBI has effectively put a stop to the entire Insurance industry in India. Because 80% of the new premium comes from sale of ULIPs in India.

What’s more interesting is that the giant LIC is exempt from this “breaking news” order! However, I read in the Mint that the SEBI clarified that it aims to cover Life Insurance Corporation (LIC)- India’s largest insurance company- and eight of the remaining insurance companies whose names did not feature in the order.

The whole ULIP affair has become an interesting boxing match between the Regulators SEBI and IRDA.

To my mind, the entire issue is about more transparency in the sale of ULIPs. So in this case, the SEBI initiative is a step in the right direction. What the SEBI is asking is why should the Insurer sell Investments with an element of Insurance, by charging the customers heavily upfront.

Broadly, the charges in a ULIP ranges upto 35-40% for the first year when it is less than 2% for a Mutual Fund.

I am also unable to understand the stand taken by the IRDA which is essentially protecting the interests of the Insurers and not the policyholders. In fact it came out with an advertisement for ULIP hardly a month back!

More views and updates:

Subramoney on the Ban Order

Mint: SEBI Bans LIC  Too

DNA Reaction

It’s match on!