Talk, Walk & Walk the Talk

Yesterday, I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Parag Parikh, Chairman PPFAS, who has written a very interesting book called “Value Investing and Behavioral Finance” published by TMH.

The takeaway for me was the remark by Mr. Parikh that he regards what he does as a “Profession” and not just a “Business”. Most of the people who provide financial services see their work as a business where their own profit motive takes precedence over what their clients need and requirements.

It’s a significant (and often ignored)point to remember while I build my business as a profession where ethics and value systems are paramount.

In the process of building a business (err.. a profession) in the financial services vertical, I am juggling with various elements of what I can offer. I see the following components of my profession.

1. To start with, there is my blog and website to organize information on personal finance. I also have an e-learning module on personal finance.

2. The RupeeManager software that can help you track and manage your money. I am also building some spreadsheets that can help you with a DIY Financial Planning/Budgeting.

3. The advisory services where I provide actual solutions to your investment needs and insurance needs. This involves a gamut of services like retirement planning, tax planning, credit management, liquidity management, financial review, etc.

1 is “Talk”, 2 is “Walk” and 3 is “Walking the Talk” :)

Walking the Talk

Walk and Talk

Your thoughts are most welcome.

Coming Soon! RupeeCamp "Financial Planning Workshop". "Join us"

Welcome back! Join me on this journey to improving our financial IQ and sharing what we know. Updates at RSS feed or Email. And spread the word please Thank You!

Do You Need To Buy a New Fund Offer (NFO)?

I received a mail from Sankha Deep Das, a reader, asking if it is advisable to invest in NFOs or in age old fund that exists above 5 years in market. He mentions that his agent says that “as the fund is new so it has immense potentiality to give good returns and as HDFC etc are very old so it does not have that much ability to give good return”

My response: The agent is trying to fool. Low or high NAV does not affect the return. You may get lesser number of units for a higher NAV but it doesn’t really matter.

Let me simplify a bit more by giving an example. Imagine two funds at NAV Rs 10 and the other at Rs 100. Let’s say that you invest Rs 10000 in each of them. In the first fund, you get 1000 units while in the second one, you get only 100 units.

Let’s also assume that both the funds give a return of 10%. So the NAV for the first fund is Rs 11, while it is Rs 110 for the other fund. Now if you sell both of them, you get the same amount. That is no. of units multiplied by NAV. It’s Rs 11000 in both cases.

Sidenote: I am uncomfortable simplifying the things so much as I feel I might be hurting the intelligence of some of my readers! But I guess, I’ll risk that!

Further, I am afraid that the agent will get more commission from NFOs. From an investor point of view, NFOs are to be totally avoided. The older fund schemes have a history of performance that you can judge. NFO does not have that.

Going for a NFO is advisable only if there’s no such fund targeting the sector that the NFO is targeting. And you want to be part of that sector.

What do you think about NFOs? Do you have to add anything?

Now Mutual Fund Advisors Multitasking As Stocks Experts

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) permitted buying and selling of mutual fund units from the stock exchange platform on November 13, 2009.

“The stock exchange mechanism would also extend the present convenience available to secondary market investors to mutual fund investors,” Sebi had stated in its circular allowing mutual fund transactions on the stock exchange infrastructure.

Now mutual fund investors will get additional access to stock trading and tips from their own mutual fund agent turned stock broker.

So top brokers will build a distribution channel where they will get financial planners, advisors and even insurance agents selling Mutual Funds and Stocks on their terminals.

All this looks very investor friendly as one single advisor can sell insurance, mutual funds and stocks.

The majority of the agents will not have the knowledge and ability to give you sound advice on all asset classes.

Moreover, I have a feeling that the investors may lose as the agent will now have a trading mechanism and Portfolio churning will happen rampantly.

What’s your view?

Conservative Debt Oriented Mutual Funds for Risk Avoiders

I often get the impression reading Business Newspapers and watching business TV channels that anybody and everybody is investing in stocks. Except me! But then the fact is that less than 10% of household savings enter the stock exchanges.

Roughly 55% goes to fixed deposits of Banks. Now that is an easy and safe option for those who don’t want to take risk.

But even when you don’t want to take risk, there are far better options. Like the ones below. These are debt oriented hybrid mutual fund schemes that gives much more return than your fixed deposits. Generally, their objective is to provide income and capital appreciation along with diversification by investing in a basket of debt and equity mutual fund schemes.

Additionally, Investing in fixed-income products through mutual funds carries a distinct advantage over bank deposits and post office monthly schemes in that the returns are earned by way of dividends that are tax free in the investors’ hands as opposed to interest earned on deposits which are taxable. Hence, while comparing these products it is important to check the post-tax returns — and these could vary depending on your tax slab as well



Fund Name


1 Year

Return


Expense

Ratio

Birla Sun Life Asset Allocation Conservative

19.50

0.35

HDFC Multiple Yield

20.37

1.75

UTI CRTS 81

22.25

1.40

UTI Mahila Unit Scheme

21.30

2.21

While you research these Mutual Funds, it is important to look at a few things.

Like the AUM (Asset Under Management). Bigger is better.

Or the expense ratio. Lower is better, obviously.

And the Fund Objective. Is it in sync with your asset allocation policies?

Mind Of A Fund Manager

Sharing what Vinay Kulkarni, Senior Fund Manager at HDFC Asset Management Co Ltd. had to say while answering question on LiveMint in their chat section.

  • Attractive valuations backed by with good growth prospects for the banking stocks due to huge demand for financial products and services (driven by the high growth in the economy) both on corporate side as well as the retail side
  • Disciplined approach to stock picking and focus on risk mitigation through a diversified portfolio of stocks has been the key driver of fund performance
  • Negative on real estate sector. While the sector has long term demand drivers in place, valuations of stocks are not attractive. On telecom sector, we are underweight because of the competitive pricing pressures in the sector
  • Our approach is more bottom up (i.e stock specific) rather than a top down, sectoral approach. However, we were overweight on banking sector, pharma sector, IT sector and engineering sector
  • We are very cautious on the real estate sector and have zero exposure to this sector
  • Discomfort with high valuations kept us away from sectors such as real estate, power utilities and NBFCs and these sectors outperformed the market. Since HDFC TaxSaver was underweight these sector, it underperformed in 2007
  • By increasing disposable income in the hands of salaried class, the Budget has boosted the prospects of FMCG companies for the coming fiscal
  • The Budget has given a boost to consumption by increasing disposable income in the hands of the salaried class. Also the return of fiscal discipline should put a cap on inflation expectations. Government’s intent to be an enabler and ensure the right environment for private enterprise is also a boost for private sector entrpreneurs
  • Currently we see good prospects for banking sector led by robust credit growth in fy11, engineering and infrastructure sector based on revival of the capex cycle, IT sector as a play on global economic recovery, pharma sector based on company specific positive drivers and the fmcg sector based on the Budget which has left more disposable income in the hands of the salaried class.
  • =====================================================
    Do you agree? Does this help you with stock selections?

    A question that he ignored was about index funds. The question asked was, “So does it make sense if i do my equity investment only through an index fund?”. It sure was an uncomfortable question for an active Fund Manager. As he couldn’t bring himself to say that index funds do outperform the actively managed mutual funds quite often.

    In any case, it’s good to know the mind of a Fund Manager.

    Advantages of Investing Through SIP

    A recent Economic Times report throws up some interesting trivia. India’s top equity diversified funds have returned 16% to 18% in the last 3 years.

    However, SIP (systematic investment plan) investors would have earned returns in the range of 25% to 28% during the same period. That too by investing in the same funds!

    So what makes all the difference is this – lump sum investors would have invested at only one level of the market. In this case, it would be 13,680 on the Sensex as on November 23, 2006. Their investments would then have subsequently gone through a rollercoaster ride of dips and surges.

    For SIP investors though, they would have invested at regular intervals during this entire period. This would have ensured that they took advantage of the low market levels each time the markets went down. Thus automatically and effortlessly doing something even fund managers could not do!

    Sounds good, No?

    Freedom from Heavy Distribution Costs in Mutual Funds

    From the newsletter “The Honest Truth” from EquityMaster.

    On August 1st, 2009 the Indian mutual fund industry enters a new era.

    After years of pushing mostly irrelevant products through a distribution channel that grew fat on the ignorance of investors, the Indian mutual fund industry has been forced to lay bare the facts. From August 1, 2009 all Indian mutual funds will have a cap on what they pay their distributors.

    And investors can pay their distributors and financial advisors what they believe to be the value of the advice given.

    Over the years, the elephants in the Indian mutual fund industry – and the distributors that made these elephants dance to their tune – have spread a series of questionable “facts”.

    Each “fact” was in many ways designed to support the immoral practice of letting commissions earned by many distributors determine which mutual funds they recommended. Funds were sold based on the commission structures paid to distributors, not based on which funds were best suited for the investors.

    The elephants in the mutual fund were happy to dance along to the tune of many distributors. Every time a fund was sold (or mis-sold) it meant a larger “total assets under management” for the industry – and more fees for the mutual fund house. And better salaries and bonuses for all in the system.

    Now, the mutual fund industry is in new territory, not because the giants chose to take the side of the good and right (in fact, they fought it) but because the regulator put a stop to the rot. The days of the symbiotic relationship between the elephants and the distributors are over.

    From August 1st the mutual fund industry has to learn to focus on what is good for the investor. A new playing field for those not used to it. So many in the mutual fund industry stand at the gate, nervous and anxious.

    However, there is already an AMC, Quantum Mutual Funds which does not pay commissions to any distributors because they were alarmed at the scope for mis-selling in the industry.

    More power to these guys.